About Features Downloads Getting Started Documentation Events Support GitHub

Love VuFind®? Consider becoming a financial supporter. Your support helps build a better VuFind®!

Site Tools


Warning: This page has not been updated in over over a year and may be outdated or deprecated.
community_call:minutes20230110

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
community_call:minutes20230110 [2023/01/10 14:22] – [2. Technology Demo: Typescript Annotations] demiankatzcommunity_call:minutes20230110 [2023/01/10 14:24] – [2. Technology Demo: Typescript Annotations] demiankatz
Line 57: Line 57:
  
 There was discussion of whether we should at some point introduce a compilation step for our Javascript assets. Down sides: introducing compilation steepens learning curve; could complicate deployment process for complex sites like Finna with many views. Advantage: would make it easier to manage dependencies, and to include libraries that don't necessarily have an easy-to-include, stand-alone .js version. There was discussion of whether we should at some point introduce a compilation step for our Javascript assets. Down sides: introducing compilation steepens learning curve; could complicate deployment process for complex sites like Finna with many views. Advantage: would make it easier to manage dependencies, and to include libraries that don't necessarily have an easy-to-include, stand-alone .js version.
 +
 +Possible middle ground on compilation: a compiled.js which lumps together third-party dependencies, without making it impossible to override VuFind-specific .js code. This could follow the precedent of compiled.css and offer some benefits without all the drawbacks.
 ==== 3. Open Q&A / Other Topics? ==== ==== 3. Open Q&A / Other Topics? ====
  
community_call/minutes20230110.txt · Last modified: 2023/01/10 14:31 by demiankatz