Warning: This page has not been updated in over over a year and may be outdated or deprecated.
community:pmc_meetings:minutes20220613
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
community:pmc_meetings:minutes20220613 [2022/06/13 12:51] – [6. Registered Service Provider Agreement] demiankatz | community:pmc_meetings:minutes20220613 [2022/06/13 15:16] – [6. Registered Service Provider Agreement] demiankatz | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:!: This is currently an agenda; it will be converted to minutes following the actual meeting. | :!: This is currently an agenda; it will be converted to minutes following the actual meeting. | ||
- | Attending: | + | Attending: |
Apologies: | Apologies: | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* Demian: schedule 8.1 release. DONE | * Demian: schedule 8.1 release. DONE | ||
* ALL: review/ | * ALL: review/ | ||
- | * Craig: finalize RSP agreement draft | + | * Craig: finalize RSP agreement draft. DONE |
- | * Craig: begin RSP form draft | + | * Craig: begin RSP form draft. DONE |
* Demian/ | * Demian/ | ||
* Leila: make progress on 2021 VuFind Summit video editing. DONE | * Leila: make progress on 2021 VuFind Summit video editing. DONE | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Mohan suggested that it would be good to announce plans for next year's Summit at the end of this year' | Mohan suggested that it would be good to announce plans for next year's Summit at the end of this year' | ||
- | The VuFind Summit call for papers has closed, with seven submissions received (one of which is a two-part event). This seems to be enough content to support a two-day Summit; we could expand to three days if any PMC members which to present and have not already submitted proposals. Demian is willing to draft a schedule once we agree on an overall length. | + | The VuFind Summit call for papers has closed, with seven submissions received (one of which is a two-part event). This seems to be enough content to support a two-day Summit; we could expand to three days if any PMC members which to present and have not already submitted proposals. Mohan wants to present about DOAJ/NepJol services -- Demian will add a slot. Demian is willing to draft a schedule once we agree on an overall length. |
===== 3. Documentation ===== | ===== 3. Documentation ===== | ||
- | Demian has opened [[https:// | + | Demian has opened [[https:// |
- | Demian also significantly trimmed back the Linked Data page, updating broken links where possible and removing outdated information. | + | Demian also significantly trimmed back the Linked Data page, updating broken links where possible and removing outdated information. The page could certainly be improved, but at least it is less potentially misleading/ |
- | Current | + | Remaining |
* Mohan: review/ | * Mohan: review/ | ||
- | * Demian: InTech Open and Linked Data pages. | + | |
===== 4. OLF Update ===== | ===== 4. OLF Update ===== | ||
- | Email updates still pending. | + | Email updates still pending |
===== 5. Release Planning ===== | ===== 5. Release Planning ===== | ||
- | Work on the 8.1 release is nearly complete. Demian proposes creating the release-8.1 branch and merging dev-9.0 into dev soon. | + | Work on the 8.1 release is nearly complete |
===== 6. Registered Service Provider Agreement ===== | ===== 6. Registered Service Provider Agreement ===== | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
Scott from OLF has reviewed the result and approves of it. | Scott from OLF has reviewed the result and approves of it. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Demian' | ||
+ | * Maybe we need some language at the top like "By submitting this form, you are expressing interest in the Registered Service Provider program. A member of the Project Management Committee will reach out to you upon receipt of the form to discuss further details; your initial submission does not obligate you to join the program." | ||
+ | * Making country a free-text field rather than drop-down might reduce long-term maintenance issues. | ||
+ | * We should probably offer an " | ||
+ | * We should consider our options for the technical infrastructure behind the form; having a file upload box may complicate matters (though it's otherwise a good idea). Ere suggested https:// | ||
+ | as a possible technical solution. | ||
+ | * If we do include the file upload box, we should offer guidance in terms of min/max dimensions, aspect ratio and file size. Leila suggested that omitting the file upload may simplify things (since we have to communicate anyway). | ||
+ | * I think a question about target customers (not just languages supported, but also geographic regions) would be very useful here. | ||
+ | * I think the past contributions question is also a good idea, though maybe it could be reframed as "How long has your company been working with/ | ||
+ | * I don't think there is a pressing need to include address/ | ||
+ | * Ere raised concerns about verifying the authenticity of submissions; | ||
Next steps: | Next steps: |
community/pmc_meetings/minutes20220613.txt · Last modified: 2022/06/13 15:39 by demiankatz