Warning: This page has not been updated in over over a year and may be outdated or deprecated.
community:pmc_meetings:minutes20220613
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
community:pmc_meetings:minutes20220613 [2022/06/13 12:55] – [3. Documentation] demiankatz | community:pmc_meetings:minutes20220613 [2022/06/13 15:16] – [6. Registered Service Provider Agreement] demiankatz | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:!: This is currently an agenda; it will be converted to minutes following the actual meeting. | :!: This is currently an agenda; it will be converted to minutes following the actual meeting. | ||
- | Attending: | + | Attending: |
Apologies: | Apologies: | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Mohan suggested that it would be good to announce plans for next year's Summit at the end of this year' | Mohan suggested that it would be good to announce plans for next year's Summit at the end of this year' | ||
- | The VuFind Summit call for papers has closed, with seven submissions received (one of which is a two-part event). This seems to be enough content to support a two-day Summit; we could expand to three days if any PMC members which to present and have not already submitted proposals. Demian is willing to draft a schedule once we agree on an overall length. | + | The VuFind Summit call for papers has closed, with seven submissions received (one of which is a two-part event). This seems to be enough content to support a two-day Summit; we could expand to three days if any PMC members which to present and have not already submitted proposals. Mohan wants to present about DOAJ/NepJol services -- Demian will add a slot. Demian is willing to draft a schedule once we agree on an overall length. |
===== 3. Documentation ===== | ===== 3. Documentation ===== | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
Scott from OLF has reviewed the result and approves of it. | Scott from OLF has reviewed the result and approves of it. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Demian' | ||
+ | * Maybe we need some language at the top like "By submitting this form, you are expressing interest in the Registered Service Provider program. A member of the Project Management Committee will reach out to you upon receipt of the form to discuss further details; your initial submission does not obligate you to join the program." | ||
+ | * Making country a free-text field rather than drop-down might reduce long-term maintenance issues. | ||
+ | * We should probably offer an " | ||
+ | * We should consider our options for the technical infrastructure behind the form; having a file upload box may complicate matters (though it's otherwise a good idea). Ere suggested https:// | ||
+ | as a possible technical solution. | ||
+ | * If we do include the file upload box, we should offer guidance in terms of min/max dimensions, aspect ratio and file size. Leila suggested that omitting the file upload may simplify things (since we have to communicate anyway). | ||
+ | * I think a question about target customers (not just languages supported, but also geographic regions) would be very useful here. | ||
+ | * I think the past contributions question is also a good idea, though maybe it could be reframed as "How long has your company been working with/ | ||
+ | * I don't think there is a pressing need to include address/ | ||
+ | * Ere raised concerns about verifying the authenticity of submissions; | ||
Next steps: | Next steps: |
community/pmc_meetings/minutes20220613.txt · Last modified: 2022/06/13 15:39 by demiankatz