About Features Downloads Getting Started Documentation Events Support GitHub

Love VuFind®? Consider becoming a financial supporter. Your support helps build a better VuFind®!

Site Tools


Warning: This page has not been updated in over over a year and may be outdated or deprecated.
community:surveys_and_statistics:understanding_discovery_platform_usage_survey_2021

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
community:surveys_and_statistics:understanding_discovery_platform_usage_survey_2021 [2022/01/14 19:07] lmgonzalescommunity:surveys_and_statistics:understanding_discovery_platform_usage_survey_2021 [2022/01/14 20:34] (current) lmgonzales
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Understanding Discovery Platform Usage Survey, 2021 ====== ====== Understanding Discovery Platform Usage Survey, 2021 ======
-The Understanding Discovery Platform Usage survey provides insight into the discovery platforms used by potential and existing VuFind® users. The aim of the survey was to understand the platforms being used by these cohorts, including the features features users liked, disliked, and wish they had in their existing discovery platforms. The survey results will be used to inform potential directions for future feature development of the VuFind® platform and inform future discussions with potential funders. +The Understanding Discovery Platform Usage survey provides insight into the discovery platforms used by potential and existing VuFind® users. The aim of the survey was to understand the platforms being used by these cohorts, including the features users liked, disliked, and wish they had in their existing discovery platforms. The survey results will be used to inform potential directions for future feature development of the VuFind® platform and inform future discussions with potential funders. 
  
-The survey instrument was sent to specific discovery communities (VuFind® and Blacklight) as well as the general library open source community (via Code4lib and other mailing lists) and responses were collected survey from November through December, 2021. A total of 49 usable responses were received. +The survey instrument was sent to specific discovery communities (VuFind® and Blacklight) as well as the general library open source community (via Code4lib and other mailing lists) and survey responses were collected from November through December, 2021. A total of 49 usable responses were received. 
  
 ===== Survey results =====  ===== Survey results ===== 
Line 13: Line 13:
 {{ :community:surveys_and_statistics:vfsurvey_2021-platformsize.jpg?nolink&600 |Approximate size of discovery platforms being used}} {{ :community:surveys_and_statistics:vfsurvey_2021-platformsize.jpg?nolink&600 |Approximate size of discovery platforms being used}}
  
-Survey participants searched primarily for online and downloadable documents and for printed / physical materials that could be loaned (92% and 86% of participants, respectively). In addition, 71% of participants indicated that they searched for bibliographic information on the survey platforms they used, and 65% of participants noted that they searched for audiovisual materials. Only 12% of participants indicated searching for maps or georeferenced data, and 14% specified other types of information they searched for including streaming services, course reserves, research subject guides, institutional repositories, unique local digital collections, and equipment (i.e., lab, multimedia, power/charging cables, computers, hotspots, etc.)+Survey participants searched primarily for online and downloadable documents and for printed / physical materials that could be loaned (92% and 86% of participants, respectively). In addition, 71% of participants indicated that they searched for bibliographic information on the discovery platforms they used, and 65% of participants noted that they searched for audiovisual materials. Only 12% of participants indicated searching for maps or georeferenced data, and 14% specified other types of information they searched for including streaming services, course reserves, research subject guides, institutional repositories, unique local digital collections, and equipment (i.e., lab, multimedia, power/charging cables, computers, hotspots, etc.)
  
 {{ :community:surveys_and_statistics:vfsurvey_2021-informationtypes.jpg?nolink&600 |Types of information searched for on discovery platforms}} {{ :community:surveys_and_statistics:vfsurvey_2021-informationtypes.jpg?nolink&600 |Types of information searched for on discovery platforms}}
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 The top discovery platform features liked by survey participants included faceted navigation, real-time integration with an ILS, the ability to define and customize search types and fields, support for integration with third-party search APIs, standards-based export support (e.g. OAI-PMH, Z39.50, etc.), and internationalization. Features liked by less than one-third of survey participants included alphabetical heading browsing, bento box searching across multiple sources, authority record integration, social features such as tags, favorites, etc., and notification functionality (SDI). Other features liked by participants included wide coverage of browsing, multi-back end drivers, ability to adjust search rankings, usability and design of the platform, an interface for managing holdings, and a very supportive and dedicated international VuFind® team. The top discovery platform features liked by survey participants included faceted navigation, real-time integration with an ILS, the ability to define and customize search types and fields, support for integration with third-party search APIs, standards-based export support (e.g. OAI-PMH, Z39.50, etc.), and internationalization. Features liked by less than one-third of survey participants included alphabetical heading browsing, bento box searching across multiple sources, authority record integration, social features such as tags, favorites, etc., and notification functionality (SDI). Other features liked by participants included wide coverage of browsing, multi-back end drivers, ability to adjust search rankings, usability and design of the platform, an interface for managing holdings, and a very supportive and dedicated international VuFind® team.
- 
- 
- 
  
 {{ :community:surveys_and_statistics:vfsurvey_2021-featuresliked.jpg?nolink&600 |Discovery platform features liked by users}} {{ :community:surveys_and_statistics:vfsurvey_2021-featuresliked.jpg?nolink&600 |Discovery platform features liked by users}}
  
- +The top discovery platform features survey participants wish they had included authority record integration (41% of participants), the ability to define and customize search types and fields (29% of participants), and notification functionality (SDI) (27% of participants). Less than one-quarter of participants indicated that they wished they had support for integration with third-party search APIs, standards-based export support (e.g. OAI-PMH, Z39.50, etc.), real-time integration with an ILS, bento box searching across multiple sources, faceted navigation, alphabetical heading browse, internationalization, and social features such as tags and favorites. Other features participants mentioned that they wished they had included statistic usage of the platform, the ability to add/update existing records, tag editing and statistics (add a tag, edit tag metadata, etc.), FRBRized organization of resources, effective de-duplication of records, easier customization of the platform, automated uploading of OPAC using SAML, and LRM compliant presentation of information. 
  
 {{ :community:surveys_and_statistics:vfsurvey_2021-featureswanted.jpg?nolink&600 |Discovery platform features users wish they had}} {{ :community:surveys_and_statistics:vfsurvey_2021-featureswanted.jpg?nolink&600 |Discovery platform features users wish they had}}
  
- +The top discovery platform features not important to or not used by survey participants were social features, notification functionality, bento box searching across multiple sources, and alphabetical heading browse functionality (39%, 24%, 20% and 20% of survey participants respectively). Sixteen percent of participants indicated that the internationalization features of the discovery platforms were not used or not important.
  
 {{ :community:surveys_and_statistics:vfsurvey_2021-featuresnotused.jpg?nolink&600 |Discovery platform features not used by or important to users}} {{ :community:surveys_and_statistics:vfsurvey_2021-featuresnotused.jpg?nolink&600 |Discovery platform features not used by or important to users}}
- 
- 
- 
  
 ===== About the survey participants =====  ===== About the survey participants ===== 
Line 70: Line 62:
  
 ---- struct data ---- ---- struct data ----
 +properties.Page Owner : 
 ---- ----
  
community/surveys_and_statistics/understanding_discovery_platform_usage_survey_2021.1642187257.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/01/14 19:07 by lmgonzales