Warning: This page has not been updated in over over a year and may be outdated or deprecated.
developers_call:minutes20150120
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
developers_call:minutes20150120 [2015/01/20 15:18] – [3. Other Topics?] demiankatz | developers_call:minutes20150120 [2015/01/20 15:25] – [2. Development Planning] demiankatz | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Some discussion of the need to reindex everything after changing the SolrMarc code to reflect the new sort key format (needs a note in the changelog). | Some discussion of the need to reindex everything after changing the SolrMarc code to reflect the new sort key format (needs a note in the changelog). | ||
+ | |||
+ | Some discussion of whether to refactor CallNumUtils to wrap around new code or keep it as a deprecated feature. There are some significant differences between new code and CallNumUtils (e.g. in handling of music call numbers, etc.) so this would not be a completely seamless transition. Tod believes most changes in new code would be viewed as improvements, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Tod will survey current use of CallNumUtils within SolrMarc. | ||
=== AlphaBrowse Enhancements === | === AlphaBrowse Enhancements === | ||
Line 39: | Line 43: | ||
==== 3. Other Topics? ==== | ==== 3. Other Topics? ==== | ||
- | Tod mentioned the possibility of adding support for Javascript plug-ins in future versions of SolrMarc as an alternative to BeanShell. | + | Tod mentioned the possibility of adding support for Javascript plug-ins in future versions of SolrMarc as an alternative to BeanShell. This might be a topic for discussion on solrmarc-tech in the future. |
===== Next Call ===== | ===== Next Call ===== | ||
developers_call/minutes20150120.txt · Last modified: 2015/03/02 17:34 by demiankatz