Warning: This page has not been updated in over over a year and may be outdated or deprecated.
developers_call:minutes20150120
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
developers_call:minutes20150120 [2015/01/20 15:22] – [2. Development Planning] demiankatz | developers_call:minutes20150120 [2015/01/20 15:27] – [2. Development Planning] demiankatz | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
Some discussion of the need to reindex everything after changing the SolrMarc code to reflect the new sort key format (needs a note in the changelog). | Some discussion of the need to reindex everything after changing the SolrMarc code to reflect the new sort key format (needs a note in the changelog). | ||
- | Some discussion of whether to refactor CallNumUtils to wrap around new code or keep it as a deprecated feature. There are some significant differences between new code and CallNumUtils (i.e. in handling of music call numbers, etc.) so this would not be a completely seamless transition. | + | Some discussion of whether to refactor CallNumUtils to wrap around new code or keep it as a deprecated feature. There are some significant differences between new code and CallNumUtils (e.g. in handling of music call numbers, etc.) so this would not be a completely seamless transition. Tod believes most changes in new code would be viewed as improvements, |
+ | |||
+ | Tod will surveyed use of CallNumUtils within SolrMarc and it seems to be used only in examples, which should make transitioning cleaner. | ||
=== AlphaBrowse Enhancements === | === AlphaBrowse Enhancements === |
developers_call/minutes20150120.txt · Last modified: 2015/03/02 17:34 by demiankatz