About Features Downloads Getting Started Documentation Events Support GitHub

Love VuFind®? Consider becoming a financial supporter. Your support helps build a better VuFind®!

Site Tools


Warning: This page has not been updated in over over a year and may be outdated or deprecated.
community:pmc_meetings:minutes20221114

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
community:pmc_meetings:minutes20221114 [2022/11/14 15:13] – [5. Community Call Restructuring/Marketing] demiankatzcommunity:pmc_meetings:minutes20221114 [2022/11/14 15:43] – [Other Items] demiankatz
Line 55: Line 55:
  
 Most remaining providers have confirmed their status. Demian was unable to get responses from CINECA (Italy) or Scanbit (Spain). Scanbit's website still actively references VuFind-related services; CINECA's does not. Most remaining providers have confirmed their status. Demian was unable to get responses from CINECA (Italy) or Scanbit (Spain). Scanbit's website still actively references VuFind-related services; CINECA's does not.
 +
 +Oliver might be able to find a CINECA contact to get clarification.
 ===== 8. Fundraising Communication Plan ===== ===== 8. Fundraising Communication Plan =====
  
Line 62: Line 64:
  
 What about a "membership drive" -- timing? Communication types? What about a "membership drive" -- timing? Communication types?
-===== 9. Product vs. Project ===== 
  
-Ere raised the point that “Project” sounds like something that has an end date, and “Product” might be a better term for our name -- Product Management CommitteeIs it worth changing? (Subsequent research reveaeled that "Project" seems to be more commonly used, so Ere withdrew the suggestion).+Craig suggested that a better understanding of the user base would be helpful in figuring out how to approach fundraising. 
 + 
 +He also suggested that once a year is sufficient, and linking it to the Summit makes sense strategically. 
 + 
 +Demian pointed out that the installation list offers some insight on the community; Ere pointed out that GitHub forks are also interesting. 
 + 
 +Leila suggested that we should articulate what the money will be used forto highlight the value. 
 +===== 9. Product vs. Project =====
  
 +Ere raised the point (based on internal discussion at National Library of Finland about reputational values) that “Project” sounds like something that has an end date, and “Product” might be a better term for our name -- Product Management Committee. Is it worth changing? (Subsequent research revealed that "Project" seems to be more commonly used, so Ere withdrew the suggestion). It was agreed to take no action at this time.
 ===== 10. Possible Future Actions ===== ===== 10. Possible Future Actions =====
  
Line 82: Line 91:
 David Maus has volunteered to fill in for Hajo starting in December, though he does not feel comfortable taking over Treasurer duties. Craig has volunteered for Treasurer, so he can fill that role if the necessity arises. Scott from OLF is helping in the near term while we wait for news. David Maus has volunteered to fill in for Hajo starting in December, though he does not feel comfortable taking over Treasurer duties. Craig has volunteered for Treasurer, so he can fill that role if the necessity arises. Scott from OLF is helping in the near term while we wait for news.
  
 +Galen asked about the status of accessibility auditing for VuFind; Demian mentioned that many institutions have done audits and contributed findings back to the project, though the core project itself has not been directly audited. Doing a project-initiated accessibility audit may be a good thing to consider as part of the development of the next theme. This could be something that fundraising could work toward.
 ===== Action Items ===== ===== Action Items =====
  
community/pmc_meetings/minutes20221114.txt · Last modified: 2022/11/14 15:49 by demiankatz