Warning: This page has not been updated in over over a year and may be outdated or deprecated.
community:surveys_and_statistics:understanding_discovery_platform_usage_survey_2021
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
community:surveys_and_statistics:understanding_discovery_platform_usage_survey_2021 [2022/01/14 18:16] – lmgonzales | community:surveys_and_statistics:understanding_discovery_platform_usage_survey_2021 [2022/01/14 19:07] – lmgonzales | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
{{ : | {{ : | ||
- | + | Survey participants searched primarily for online and downloadable documents and for printed / physical materials that could be loaned (92% and 86% of participants, | |
{{ : | {{ : | ||
+ | Over half of survey participants indicated that the discovery platforms they used were designed for either higher education users (i.e., faculty, staff, students) or for the general public (88% and 51% of survey participants respectively). Six percent of participants indicated that the discovery platforms they used were designed for either government staff, internal use by the hosting organization, | ||
+ | {{ : | ||
- | + | The top discovery platform features liked by survey participants included faceted navigation, real-time integration with an ILS, the ability to define and customize search types and fields, support for integration with third-party search APIs, standards-based export support (e.g. OAI-PMH, Z39.50, etc.), and internationalization. Features liked by less than one-third | |
- | {{ : | + | |
community/surveys_and_statistics/understanding_discovery_platform_usage_survey_2021.txt · Last modified: 2022/01/14 20:34 by lmgonzales